.......

x

 Durrand Glacier Avalanche--The BC Coroner's Report

November 3, 2003--The British Columbia Coroner's Service has released its Judgement of Inquiry report regarding events surrounding the tragic avalanche at Selkirk Mountain Experience last January 20th. The avalanche buried thirteen people, killing seven, four Canadians and three Americans. A total of 21 skiers were divided into two groups, one climbing directly above the other in Tumbledown Mountain's La Traviata Couloir when the avalanche struck. While the Coroner's report is sure to draw fire (in fact we have received information indicating that there are a number of factual errors, we will have to return to that at another time), its details confirm many points made by those who have been critical of the decisions made that day on the Durrand Glacier.

 Related Stories
Whitewash on Tumbledown
Independent Investigation Report
Independent Investigation PDF 1
Independent Investigation PDF 2

Among the key findings (emphasis added):

  • The La Traviata West Couloir "is strongly affected by wind and showed signs of the snow cover being affected by southeast winds this year and in photos from previous years...(the couloir) that the group was ascending is a broad shallow wind scoured gully with a lee feature on the southeast side. It has an average slope of 35 degrees and a maximum angle of 37 degrees."
  • "The whole area drains onto a flat bench with some old moraine features. Below the west couloir the moraine features created a shallow depression. This depression acted as a terrain trap, causing the avalanche to stop very quickly and for the deposit to pile up in the depression rather than fan out. This, plus the size and speed of the avalanche, caused the victims to be buried very deeply in hard packed snow."
  • "The guests were told to spread out about five feet apart. "
  • "..climatic events mid to late November 2002 created a weak layer in the snow pack that remained throughout the winter. This November rain crust layer was general and widespread throughout British Columbia and was seen as a serious threat throughout the ski industry."
  • "The Canadian Avalanche Association issued a Public Avalanche Bulletin on January 17, 2003..the travel advisory read: 'It is important to remember that this El Nino year is producing a complex and unusual snow pack for the mountains of BC. Be alert for remote triggering and continue to be vigilant about avoiding those tempting big steep alpine faces. Any avalanche triggered on the older weaknesses may propagate extensively into a large and dangerous avalanche event.' "
  • "On January 21, 2003, (investigator) STANIER went to the site of the avalanche and conducted his on site investigation. .. At the high point of the group's up track he found a very weak, shallow snow pack in (a) rocky wind scoured area. This high point was very different from the mostly strong deep snow pack found in the gully that the group was ascending. The November rain crust was found throughout the shallow area fairly near to the surface due to wind scouring. It is clear that the weight of the first skiers triggered the failure here where there was no sufficient bridging strength in the snow pack to isolate them from this layer. "
  • "The first avalanche was a class 3... This avalanche crossed the group’s track from earlier in the day...A second, small class 1 avalanche then released .. on the rounded ridge between the first avalanche and the group’s ascent route. The main fatal avalanche then released on the group's ascent route. It is not possible to know exactly what the mechanism was that caused the second and third avalanches to release in this case. They either released sympathetically by the vibration of the first avalanche, or the failure propagated around the lower slope. The rain crust did connect all these features so that is a possibility.
  • "The fracture line of the fatal avalanche was at 2510 m on a 33 degree southwest-facing slope (editor's note: this would appear to be a possible mistake in the report, given the earlier description of the slope)..The area is wind scoured with a lee feature on the southeast end... The fracture showed clearly that the shear failure was on the November rain crust and there was no evidence that the failure stepped down from any upper layers. "

Finally, in (for its implications) what is perhaps the most tragic finding in the report:

  • "Profiles taken at the avalanche fracture line where the group’s track crossed it show a very strong well-settled snow pack above the November crust. Profiles taken near the rocks at the NW end of the fracture are much more similar to the profiles taken in the shallow wind affected areas near where the group triggered the original avalanche...Probing around the area above the fracture line showed a gradual decrease in depth and strength as the slope becomes lower angle and wind exposed near where the avalanche was triggered. The November rain crust was felt in all locations while probing where the snow depth was over 40 cm and in all the snow profiles."

Put bluntly, the Coroner's shows that there was a known and widespread instability in the area due to a well-noted rain crust from November. The two groups, with members of each group closely spaced together, climbed a steep, prime avalanche angle (and obviously wind loaded) slope, with a deadly terrain trap lying below. The upper group triggered an avalanche that released on the November rain crust connecting all of the terrain features in the area. The rain crust would have been relatively easy to detect though probing or pitting to the ground. These are many of the key points made from the start by those who have been most critical of the approach to the tour taken that fateful day at Selkirk Mountain Experience.

Nevertheless, at least some friends and family of the victims are not completely comfortable with the report, its tone and its conclusions . Annie Polucha, sister of victim Kathie Polucha Kessler says she wishes that authorities in Canada had been more forthcoming in addressing the issues of the decisions made by the SME guides last January 20th. Polucha has also said she wonders if there might be some bias in the Coroner's Judgement of Inquiry. "Just three paragraphs into the report SME is called 'world renowned,' I read that and wondered 'what is that doing in here?," says Annie. "When you read a comment like that it in an official report that is supposed to be unbiased, well, it makes you wonder."

 

The BC Coroner's Judgement of Inquiry Report

(Editor's note: this report would appear to be one of several prepared for each of the deceased, in this case the victim was Vern Lunsford, 49, an aerospace engineer from Littleton, Colorado)

Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General
BC Coroners Service
Judgement of Inquiry
Into the Death of
LUNSFORD JR., RALPH VERNON
Case No: 2003:528:0002 Police File: 2003-0158 Police Department: Revelstoke RCMP

SUMMARY OF EVENTS:

On January 20, 2003, at approximately 1120 hours, the Revelstoke RCMP Detachment was advised that there had been an avalanche in the area of the Durrand glacier, approximately 25 kilometers north of Revelstoke British Columbia and that there were numerous burials and loss of life. Search and rescue efforts had been underway since 1045 hours and Emergency Health Services had personnel on site. Two RCMP constables were sent to the scene. Weather was problematic and became a factor in the outside rescue effort. Fog in the area made it difficult to fly to the incident site. When outside help arrived the rescue effort was almost complete.

Those involved in the avalanche were guides, staff and clients of Selkirk Mountain Experience, a privately owned hut operation specializing in ski touring. 21 people had been ascending a run called La Traviata West Couloir (Couloir- a deep gorge or gully on a mountain side) when they triggered an avalanche. 13 people were involved in the avalanche, 7 died of asphyxiation before they could be rescued.

INVESTIGATIVE FINDINGS:

Selkirk Mountain Experience is a world renowned hut based wilderness ski touring lodge located in the Selkirk Mountain range a short distance north of Revelstoke British Columbia in an area known as the Durrand Glacier. The company caters to experienced clientele who want a demanding and physically challenging skiing experience. It is accessible only by helicopter. Clients are flown in Saturday mornings and spend a week at the lodge. The morning of the first day is spent learning about and practicing the use of Pieps (transceivers) and Probes and site orientation. The afternoon usually involves ski touring on nearby runs.

Ralph Vernon ‘Vern’ LUNSFORD JR, age 49 years, of Littleton, Colorado, U.S.A. arrived at the lodge on Saturday, January 18, 2003 along with 19 other guests. On Monday, January 20, he was among 21 skiers intending to spend the day ski touring. They were divided into two groups and intended to ski together for the day. The leader of the first group was the owner of Selkirk Mountain Experience. He is a UIAGM certified guide (UIAGM is French- the English equivalent is IFMGA- International Federation of Mountain Guides Association). The assistant guide, a certified alpine climbing guide and certified assistant ski guide, led the second group. Both the lead guide and assistant guide were operating within the guidelines set out by the ACMG (Association of Canadian Mountain Guides) Terrain Guidelines They departed the Selkirk Mountain Experience lodge at approximately 0800 hours, intending to ski Fronalp Peak and later in the day La Traviata West Couloir. When they arrived in the area of Tumbledown Mountain they could see heavy fog sitting on Fronalp Peak. The lead guide decided to ski La Traviata first. The change in plan was communicated by radio to the assistant guide who was leading the second group a short distance behind. It was decided that both groups would ski La Traviata.

An avalanche investigation report, commissioned by the British Columbia Coroners Service, was prepared by Mr. Larry STANIER of Canmore Alberta. His report has been quoted extensively throughout this Judgement of Inquiry.

La Traviata is found on the National Topographic System 1:50,000 82M/8 Downie Creek. UTM coordinates are east 294 and north 823.

Mr. STANIER describes La Traviata West Couloir as an open alpine, southwest facing slope approximately 180 metres high, bounded by cliffs to the west and steeper terrain to the east. It is on the south face of the west Ridge of Tumbledown Mountain. It is strongly affected by wind and showed signs of the snow cover being affected by southeast winds this year and in photos from previous years. Most of the surrounding terrain is very rocky. The La Traviata West Couloir that the group was ascending is a broad, shallow, wind scoured gully with a lee feature on the southeast side. It has an average slope of 35 degrees and a maximum angle of 37 degrees on the skier’s left at mid-slope. The ground cover of the west couloir is mostly scree in the summer. Where the couloir becomes indistinct at the top the terrain becomes gentler and rocky and much more wind affected.

The whole area drains onto a flat bench with some old moraine features. Below the west couloir the moraine features created a shallow depression. This depression acted as a terrain trap, causing the avalanche to stop very quickly and for the deposit to pile up in the depression rather than fan out. This, plus the size and speed of the avalanche, caused the victims to be buried very deeply in hard packed snow. There were no boulders or trees in the track or run out that could cause traumatic injuries to someone caught in the flowing avalanche.

Selkirk Mountain Experience estimates they have skied the run an average of 10 times a year with two groups of skiers in the early season for the past 17 years. They had not skied the run this season as they had primarily been running ski mountaineering courses to this point and prefer to ski on glaciated terrain where possible. The say they almost never use the run mid to late season as the access and exit from the area is threatened by the large, steep south face of Tumbledown Mountain. As temperatures and solar radiation effect increase as the season progresses this becomes more and more of a hazard. Selkirk Mountain Experience also claim they have never seen an avalanche on the La Traviata West Couloir.

Mr STANIER states that the groups approached the La Traviata West Couloir staying high under the rocks to the west and climbed steeply to minimize the number of turns necessary to reach the top. The guests were told to spread out about five feet apart. The lead guide reached the lower angle terrain at the top of the slope and stopped to regroup and prepare to descend at some rocks just below the ridge. The lead guide felt a large settlement (whumph) of the snow and felt the energy going south. He saw some snow moving. This would have been the first class 3 avalanche the ran down the south aspect. A few seconds later the guests that were within his sight yelled avalanche.

The lead guide and seven guests were left above the fracture line. The lead guide called the lodge to report the avalanche; they called Selkirk Mountain Helicopters who initiated the main outside agency response. The lead guide and the seven remaining guests skied down the slope and began the rescue effort.

The avalanche ran in two main waves. The second wave, in combination with the large volume of snow, and the terrain trap at the bottom of the slope, resulted in many deep burials.

Thirteen people were caught in the avalanche. Two were partially buried and survived. Four were completely buried and survived. Seven, including Vern LUNSFORD, Craig KELLY, Naomi HEFFLER, David FINNERTY, Jean-Luc SCHWENDENER, Dennis YATES, and Kathleen KESSLER were buried and died of asphyxiation.

Mr. STANIER describes in detail the history of the winter snow pack in the Selkirk Mountains. This is an important aspect of his report as climatic events mid to late November 2002 created a weak layer in the snow pack that remained throughout the winter. This November rain crust layer was general and widespread throughout British Columbia and was seen as a serious threat throughout the ski industry. The Canadian Avalanche Association issued a Public Avalanche Bulletin on January 17, 2003. It rated the avalanche hazard in the North Columbia Region as Considerable in the alpine and at tree line (Natural avalanches possible, Human triggered avalanches possible); and Moderate below tree line (Natural slab avalanches unlikely. Human triggered avalanches possible). The travel advisory read: “It is important to remember that this El Nino year is producing a complex and unusual snow pack for the mountains of BC. Be alert for remote triggering and continue to be vigilant about avoiding those tempting big steep alpine faces. Any avalanche triggered on the older weaknesses may propagate extensively into a large and dangerous avalanche event. Be aware of how stresses penetrate deeper into the snow pack as you group up.”

On January 21, 2003, Mr. STANIER went to the site of the avalanche and conducted his on site investigation. His investigation included taking measurements, doing snow profiles, interviewing witnesses, and taking photographs. At the high point of the groups up track he found a very weak, shallow snow pack in the rocky wind scoured area. This high point was very different from the mostly strong deep snow pack found in the gully that the group was ascending. The November rain crust was found throughout the shallow area fairly near to the surface due to wind scouring. It is clear that the weight of the first skiers triggered the failure here, where there was no sufficient bridging strength in the snow pack to isolate them from this layer. The failure propagated SE on the rain crust; the initial avalanche released due to failure in tension where the terrain steepened to 30 degrees.

The first avalanche was a class 3 (Avalanches are rated on a five point scale, class 1 is small and relatively harmless to people through to class 5 which is the largest snow avalanche known with potential for massive destruction) on a wind scoured south aspect at 2450 metres. The fracture line was approximately 50 m wide and an average of 50 cm deep and ran approximately 400 m. This avalanche crossed the group’s track from earlier in the day. A second, small class 1 avalanche then released in almost unskiable terrain at approximately half height on the rounded ridge between the first avalanche and the group’s ascent route. The main fatal avalanche then released on the groups ascent route. It is not possible to know exactly what the mechanism was that caused the second and third avalanches to release in this case. They either releases sympathetically by the vibration of the first avalanche, or the failure propagated around the lower slope. The rain crust did connect all these features so that is a possibility. The fatal avalanche overran part of the second avalanche. Therefore, we can only assume that the propagation spread from the second avalanche to the group’s ascent route or that the release of the second avalanche extended onto the ascent route and took out some of the support for the slab above the rain crust and this caused the failure.

The fracture line of the fatal avalanche was at 2510 m on a 33 degree southwest-facing slope. The area is wind scoured with a lee feature on the southeast end. The fracture line was 65 m wide. The minimum depth of the fracture was 63 cms at the skier’s right side. The maximum depth was 260 cm in a lee pocket on the skier’s left side. The average depth was 150 cm. The fracture showed clearly that the shear failure was on the November rain crust and there was no evidence that the failure stepped down from any upper layers. The avalanche ran approximately 350 m.

Profiles taken at the avalanche fracture line where the group’s track crossed it show a very strong well-settled snow pack above the November crust. Profiles taken near the rocks at the NW end of the fracture are much more similar to the profiles taken in the shallow wind affected areas near where the group triggered the original avalanche.

Probing around the area above the fracture line showed a gradual decrease in depth and strength as the slope becomes lower angle and wind exposed near where the avalanche was triggered. The November rain crust was felt in all locations while probing where the snow depth was over 40 cm and in all the snow profiles.

CONCLUSION

British Columbia experienced unseasonably warm weather in November 2002 with precipitation in the form of rain falling on snow in mountainous areas. When temperatures cooled, a significant melt-freeze crust was left on the snow pack. This crust was present across the mountains of Western Canada from the Coast Range to the Rockies and was particularly pronounced in the northern Selkirk Mountains. Widespread avalanche activity was reported in the northern Selkirk Mountains between January 2, 2003 and January 19, 2003. Infoex subscribers (a daily exchange of information provided by the Canadian Avalanche Association between subscribing operations managing avalanche hazards in Western Canada) were aware that a significant number of skier remote triggered avalanches were occurring. This was a strong indication that the weight of a skier could be sufficient trigger to cause avalanches. More significantly, it shows that the weight of a skier could trigger the failure of a snow layer and this failure can propagate across the terrain. This information was only available to Infoex subscribers. Selkirk Mountain Experience did not subscribe to Infoex, the only information they had was their own observations and the known avalanche rating of ‘Considerable’.

Professional guides must meet certification guidelines set the the Association of Canadian Mountain Guides. The sport of ski touring however is unregulated. There are no guidelines to say what is an acceptable risk, how many people should be on a slope at the same time, how many people should be in each party, or any of the other questions which arise after a tragic event. An individual skier can chose not to follow his guide into an area that appears to present a level of risk greater than that he or she is willing to accept.

Mr. LUNSFORD was a highly skilled and experienced skier who was spending a week of guided ski touring at Selkirk Mountain Experience. His holiday would see him guided into some of the best ski touring terrain in the world. He (and the other clients) would rely on the decisions made by their guide to give them the best skiing experience possible, balanced against their expectations and the risk involved to meet that objective. These decisions are based on past experience in the area; day-to-day observations of the snow conditions; training; the ability of the client; and interpretation of snow stability through snow profiling, probing and testing. In most cases, the higher the skill level of the client, the more challenging the terrain they want to ski, which leads to higher levels of risk.

Ski touring is an inherently dangerous sport. People who ski at this level are aware of the risk. Release of Liability/Waiver of claims documents are routinely signed before skiing begins.

I find that Ralph Vernon LUNSFORD died on January 20, 2003, in the area know as La Traviata West Couloir, approximately 25 kilometres north of Revelstoke, British Columbia. The cause of death was determined to be Asphyxiation, due to being buried in snow following an avalanche.

I classify this death as accidental.

Pursuant to Section 3(2)(d) of the Coroners Act, the following recommendations are forwarded to the Chief Coroner of British Columbia for distribution to the appropriate person or persons.

Dated this 23rd day of September 2003.

Charles H. PURSE, A Coroner
In and for the Province of British Columbia.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

To:

Mr. John WILLOW
Director, Policy and Economic Development
Business Development Division
Land and Water British Columbia
PO Box 9475 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9W6

To:

Mr. Clair ISRAELTON
Executive Director
Canadian Avalanche Association
Box 2759
Revelstoke, B.C. V0E 2S0

BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATION

Wilderness adventure tourism is one of the fastest growing sports in British Columbia. The number of commercial ski touring lodges and hut operations has grown with the growth in adventure tourism. Client safety is an issue that commercial operators must deal with on a daily basis. Guides make decisions related to client safety on a daily, sometimes minute-to-minute basis. In order to make the correct decision it must be an informed decision, based on as much information as is available at the time. Commercial operators, operating in isolation from their neighbors, limit themselves in the amount of information at hand.

In 1991, after several avalanche deaths in the helicopter skiing industry, the Canadian Avalanche Association (CAA) developed a program called Infoex after two consecutive Coroner’s recommendations. The Infoex provides daily avalanche, snow and weather information to subscribing members. Each subscribing member pays an annual fee and must contribute daily avalanche, snow, and weather observations to the CAA. This information is complied by CAA staff, analyzed, and made available to subscribers in the form of a daily bulletin. This information is a valuable tool for accurate avalanche forecasting.

1. It is recommended that all commercial operations, where client safety could be affected by avalanches, be required to participate in Infoex. Program participation in Infoex could be a requirement of the land use tenure.

To:

Association of Canadian Mountain Guides
Karl KLASSEN, Executive Director
PO Box 8341
Canmore, Alberta
T1W 2V1

BACKGROUND OF THE RECOMMENDATION

As research continues the knowledge of snow science has grown rapidly. Certified guides must keep abreast of the latest research concerning snow science in order to offer their clients the greatest assurance of safety. Avalanche courses and snow seminars are offered on a regular basis and should be attended by certified guides on a regular, or scheduled, basis.

With the increase in the number of commercial ski touring lodges and hut operations comes the need for these operators to promote standards of safety, client care and operating methods for the industry. The formation of an association, similar to the British Columbia Helicopter Skiing and Snowcat Operators Association, would serve the interests of everyone involved in the ski touring industry.

2. It is recommended that a copy of this Judgement of Inquiry be forwarded for information purposes.

(End of report)

Cover | Site Map | News Page | Talk Forum